What To Expect In 2026
ApplicantLab |
January 5, 2026

Exploring the predictions for business education in 2026, John Byrne, Maria Wich-Vila, and Caroline Diarte Edwards dive into how technological trends, especially AI, will shape the MBA landscape. Maria kicks off the discussion by highlighting that AI’s role will expand but with a growing need for discernment. Despite AI’s potential to simplify tasks, she cautions against over-reliance on it, pointing out the competitive disadvantage that could arise if everyone adopts the technology without critical engagement. Business schools are thus expected to sharpen their focus on critical thinking skills, ensuring students are equipped to navigate this evolving environment.

Caroline adds depth to the discussion by emphasizing how business schools have already begun integrating AI into their curricula, transforming it from a mere elective to a foundational element. This integration underscores the importance of judgment and creativity—skills that AI cannot replicate. Caroline argues that authenticity and interpersonal skills will be crucial differentiators for students competing against AI-driven processes. As business schools cultivate these human-centric skills, they also prepare students for a job market where human creativity and connectivity become vital assets.

For MBA hopefuls and business education enthusiasts, these insights highlight a future where the fusion of AI and human skills creates new opportunities and challenges. Schools are not only adapting but are actively evolving to meet the demands of an AI-augmented world, ensuring students emerge as adept, discerning leaders.

Episode Transcript

Note: This transcript was generated by AI and may contain minor inaccuracies.

[00:00:04] – John

Well, Happy New Year, everyone. This is John Byrne with Poets & Quants. Welcome to business Casual, our weekly podcast with my co-host, Caroline Diarte Edwards and Maria Wigvilla. Caroline, as you know, is a co-founder of Fortuna Admissions and a former Managing Director of Admissions at Enzian. Maria, of course, is our favorite Harvard MBA and the founder of applicant Lab. We want to talk about the new year. What can you look forward to in 2026? What are our New Year’s predictions for business education in general and the MBA in particular. Our conversation follows our annual feature on New Year’s predictions, business school thought leaders look ahead to 2026. That’s the headline on the story at Poets & Quants, where we asked deans and other leaders in business education to give us their predictions for the year. For us, we are looking at, as always, a year that we’re going to start with a lot of challenges, but a lot of promise and a lot of hope. Maria, why don’t you start us off with what you think is going to happen in in 2026?

[00:01:31] – Maria

Well, I think one of the key things, regardless of… I know that there’s a lot of uncertainty and a lot of different factors in terms of political or economic, but I think the one thing that we can count on is that the dialog around AI is going to continue to increase, shift, change. I think AI is going to simultaneously take on an increasing role in day-to-day discussions and how business school students apply to business school or within business school. But I also think that there’s going to be growing discernment and awareness around all the places where AI is going wrong. I personally have been heavily using AI or experimenting with it, and even though it’s been out for a few years, it’s still You see the promise of it, but I have also encountered more times than not, it just feeds me something that sounds so good. It tells it to me with the utmost confidence, and it is so proud of itself when It delivers back to me absolute garbage. I think that we are going to start seeing these paradigm shifts where we acknowledge that AI is here to stay, but we also realize that we cannot simply rely upon it as a crutch and take whatever it says at face value.

[00:02:49] – Maria

I think that there’s going to be a change in the education landscape to not only incorporate AI more, but to also teach these levels of discernment and critical thinking. At the end of the day, that’s what business schools have always taught in many levels. I don’t think that AI, if anything, AI makes it more important to be a good critical thinker, because if it’s really easy for you… One of the things that I always find so funny is that people are like, Oh, AI makes things so easy. But if it makes it really easy for you, it also makes it really easy for your competitors. If you’re competing in a job market with other people who are also just spending 30 seconds to put a prompt into AI and they’re like, Hey, this is my ticket I’m out of here. I don’t actually have to do any thinking. Well, guess what? Now you are also at a competitive disadvantage. If it’s easy for you, it’s easy for everyone else. I just think that the attitude around AI will have to shift in the education landscape. Along with it.

[00:03:46] – John

Caroline, your view on AI and its impact in 2026 on business education.

[00:03:51] – Caroline

I think we’ve seen a tremendous transformation in 2025 with schools infusing AI into the curriculum and really embracing this. And it’s been a tremendous challenge for schools, and I think it’s very impressive how quickly they’ve risen to the challenge and launched new courses and also just integrated AI into the existing curriculum. So I think that that will continue to progress. The AI will not be an add-on or an elective, but it will just be part of foundational curriculum and confused in everything that you learn about at business school. And I completely agree with Maria that judgment is super important, that you can’t count on AI to get things right, clearly. And so that human judgment and having the skills to use it properly are absolutely critical. And so business schools play a very important role in teaching students how to do that. And I think that also in an age of AI and so much fake content, humanity becomes even more important, and humanity gives you an edge, right? So cultivating your authenticity is even more important than it might have been in the past, because people will be competing with bots, and your differentiator is your humanity and your creativity and your ability to connect with people and so on, all those interpersonal communication skills that for the time being, machines cannot replicate.

[00:05:30] – Caroline

So I think that that is something that schools are looking to cultivate and support students in differentiating themselves in the marketplace. And of course, it will also impact the job landscape and the recruitment opportunities. We were talking before we started recording about consulting and McKinsey planning on hiring, increasing recruitment in 2026. And in times of change, management consultants always do very well, right? Whether it’s a positive change in the market is changing and growing and innovating, or whether there’s a recession and companies have to cut costs. Either way, consultancy firms do well. And this is just a massive transformational challenge for organizations of all sizes, which is therefore a fantastic opportunity consulting firms. I think that we will see very strong recruiting, especially in management consulting in 2026.

[00:06:38] – John

Yeah, definitely true, because it’s early stage is still, and a lot of companies are trying to figure out how to take advantage and leverage AI technologies. Schools have taken a very aggressive stance in the curriculum, and I think a lot of companies are going to be very eager to hire young people who then can immediately teach teach them how to deploy AI for decision making, for data analysis, and for operational efficiencies. In this early stage, while everyone worries about AI eliminating jobs, I think for MBAs in particular, older graduates, I think there’s going to be more opportunity on the employment side as a result of AI. I also think that up until now, a lot of schools have done experiments, they’ve done pilots with using AI in the curriculum. I think 2026 is going to come and allow us to see AI in full bloom at every business school. It’s true that every business school has done something in AI by now. But in 2026, the schools that haven’t quite figured it out are going to figure it out and really deploy it and embed it in every single course in a way that makes sense to get graduates job ready for employers who really need these skills.

[00:08:05] – John

The other thing about this is what Caroline also said. In a way, it requires schools to double down on soft skills. Why? Because it’s something AI can’t do. As AI gets better and better, it’s important that people can collaborate effectively, can present and persuade well, can negotiate with others, can do the kinds of things that AI, frankly, can’t do. And so getting graduates ready to deal with ambiguous decision making and presentation and persuasion is going to be more important than it’s ever been in a world where AI will be doing a lot of the nitty-gritty number crunching that was the province of analyst jobs for many undergraduates and some the A’s, frankly. The other big issue, I think, is the political situation. We will be entering the second year of the Trump administration. We know there’s been a fair amount of anti-immigration rhetoric and anti-immigration action in the United States. It’s caused a great deal of fear among those who may want to come here for a US education. I’m thinking that, as we’ve said before, international applications are going to be down, and it’ll probably be down significantly, given both those anti-immigration initiatives that have occurred, as well as the new $100,000 tax on an H-1B visa, that’s going to make it a little more difficult to stay in the US, even with OPT, beyond your OPT training.

[00:09:56] – John

I would think that that is a advantage for domestic applicants because schools are going to have to dig deeper into the domestic pool. It’s probably even good for the international applicants who actually apply because they’re also going to have to dig deeper into those international pools because you got to understand that a lot of admission officers will be accepting people, particularly from abroad, who may or may not be able to come. And so they’re going to over-invite people, I would think. Caroline, don’t you think that’s true?

[00:10:30] – Caroline

Yes, absolutely. And we’ve seen that in round one that there has been a full, at least in our experience, in international applicants being willing to apply to the US and focusing more on international schools. And so it has made it more competitive for the candidates getting into the top international schools. And at the same time, as you say, those who do decide to apply to the top US schools have a better chance of getting it right now. So rather paradoxically, it could actually be a great time to apply to a US program for an international candidate. But sure, I’m in a challenging time for admissions. And of course, the international applicants bring so much to the classroom in terms of diversity of perspective and different experiences and so on. And I expect we will see a decline in the percentage of international students at the schools next fall, which is a shame for everybody, for So candidates who might have the advantage of having the US education and all the opportunities that come with that and won’t take that route, as well as the domestic candidates or the domestic students who learn so much from their international peers.

[00:11:46] – Caroline

So it’s unfortunate. Perhaps it will be interesting to see how things continue in the higher education landscape this year. I wonder if given the Trump administration attention’s tendency to flit from one thing to the next and his short attention span, whether perhaps other things will take precedence and perhaps the attack on higher education will diminish. So let’s see. It’s impossible to predict, of course, what the Trump administration will do. By its very nature, it’s very unpredictable. But I think it’s possible that the attacks that we’ve seen in 2025, perhaps, will subside in 2026.

[00:12:30] – John

Right. The other issue, of course, is the economy, because the economy often determines application volume. And we know the economy in the US right now is pretty uncertain. There is a possibility that the economy could fall into a recession, which tends to create a surge in applications as people look in front of them and see fewer opportunities available and think that that’s a great time to go and get a graduate education, increase your credentials and your opportunities. What do you think about that, Maria?

[00:13:05] – Maria

Yeah, it’s possible that if there is a recession in the US economy in particular, that there may be an increase in domestic applicants that might make up for the shortfall in international applicants. Where that ends up netting out, I’m not sure. But I think something that combines both the political and the economic discussion is I think that more of the international business schools are going to start seeing that high influx of talent from around the world. So the US is no longer the number one default destination. Even if Trump, let’s say, decides to stop attacking higher education, so student visas are easier to come by, Who knows what’s going to happen with OPT and H-1B? I mean, I’ve got clients from Round 1 who were international who got accepted. Two years ago, they would have grabbed those spots without a second thought. But now a lot of them are asking, rightfully so, what happens if two years from now I graduate, and I’m not allowed to stay in the country, and I’ve got $180,000 US dollars of debt, it does start to become a pretty scary proposition for a lot of people. But I think that the US’s loss is also Asia’s gain, Europe’s gain.

[00:14:17] – Maria

I also want to say that even in the short term, if some of these Visa, Michigas, and lunacy gets clarified, the US is also not funding innovation right now. We’ve funding scientific research that is the engine and has been the engine of the economy ever since World War II in this country. Even if these short term visa issues do get sorted, I don’t know if the US is going to be the place for the next 20 or 30 years that is the real engine of growth in the world. All of this is to say any shortfalls in international candidates to the US schools, I think we’re going to start seeing this might be the rise It’s the beginning of the rise of some of these Asian schools that have been slowly but surely climbing their way up the quality ladder. Maybe in the next year or so, we start seeing real big jumps in terms of their presence on the global stage and their marketing themselves and becoming really a top-of-mind, first-choice destination for a lot of the world’s talent.

[00:15:21] – John

Right. The other issue we see happening already is universities coming to business schools and asking for more funding, putting higher taxes on business school tuitions and fees, because the university is in a more precarious financial position given the funding suspensions from the federal government and state governments. So it’s putting more pressure on business school economics and what that could mean. In one sense, there are a lot of MBA programs, particularly those in second-tier schools that are run at a significant loss. And they are like in supermarket, you have so-called lost leaders, where you basically price certain basic items at or below their cost to drive people into the store. It’s a similar policy that many business schools have where you basically underprice an MBA, despite the high prices you see, the high price tags, you actually underprice because there’s a lot of rampant discounting, so that very few people pay those price tags. The reason for that is because you want a US news ranking, primarily, that will cast a positive glow on all your other programs and allow you to have a prestige across all the schools’ programs. Because after all, US news is MBA ranking often is associated with the ranking for the entire school.

[00:16:58] – John

So some schools are willing to operate with red ink. Now, that may be less true when the university comes knocking on the dean’s door and says, Hey, I need to increase the tax on your business school revenue by double because we have shortfalls in all to other areas. And that may lead some deans to conclude that, Hey, I cannot afford to have a small MBA program that loses money every single year. That could be a problem that becomes more obvious obvious in 2026. Caroline, what do you think?

[00:17:33] – Caroline

Yeah, I agree. I think there’s a lot of pressure on business schools, given the shift in integration of AI, which has costs. If you’ve got to revamp the curriculum, there is a cost associated with that. The decline in international students coming to the US will hit many programs very hard. We’ve seen over the past few years some closures of MBA programs. So I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw more closures of schools outside of that top tier in 2026.

[00:18:09] – John

Maria?

[00:18:11] – Maria

Yeah, I agree with Caroline. I think there will be more closures of these smaller programs that are perhaps not financially viable, but maybe to take their place, we’ll start seeing increasing numbers of microcredentials, perhaps one-year MBAs or mini masters or certificates that are both less expensive, perhaps, for the student, but still provide revenue for the school and still provide that some level of upskilling to allow people to use that business school education to advance their careers, even if it looks different from the traditional two-year full-time residential MBA that we’ve become so used to. I think that might be some of the nimble adaptation that some of the schools might need to keep their top line afloat.

[00:18:59] – John

What about some of the specialties that have emerged? There’s been in this generation a greater interest in sustainability, even though we now have in the US an administration that basically has little to no interest in sustainable enterprise. Or entrepreneurship, where schools have invested massively in helping students create business plans and find investment for ideas and projects. Or what about data analytics, where many schools have really doubled down on that in the last five years, given the overwhelming amount of data currently available to business decision-makers. How do you see things like that playing out in 2026? Caroline?

[00:19:49] – Caroline

Yeah. So I think we see increased interest in entrepreneurship, and we’ve seen some very impressive numbers in the careers data from 2025 of the number and percentage of students from some of the top programs who are starting their own company or joining a startup when they graduate. And so I think given all the opportunities that AI creates, this is a wonderful time to start a company. I think we’re at an inflection point where we’re going to see a lot of new companies emerge and new winners. So there’s a tremendous upheaval right now, and that creates opportunities for entrepreneurs. So I think that we have seen that in 2025, and that will continue this year. So definitely entrepreneurship is a huge area. And then I think the skills that are relevant for consulting. So as you mentioned, data analytics and be able to use those tools and have the judgment to know how to make decisions based on data analytics. As as well as change management skills, organizational management, given that a lot of those consulting projects will be about managing transformations at a large scale. So I think that all of those, the electives that are also about softer skills and leadership and change management will get a lot of take up in 2026 as well.

[00:21:27] – John

Maria?

[00:21:28] – Maria

Yeah, you mentioned the the increasing interest in sustainability, and there’s no question as to why that is the case. I think every other day there’s a new headline about either extreme, some extreme weather happening in multiple places in the world all at once. I am a little sad in that. I feel like in the past few years, there’s been this huge increase in interest from students and schools alike. I don’t know that the job opportunities are materializing, though. When I have folks reach out to me and say, Well, I want to use the MBA to pursue a sustainability focus for sustainable business, it’s not clear to me that corporate America is necessarily stepping up with the sorts of job opportunities that match that skill set. I do think that is part of, John, the political environment that you referenced a few minutes ago. I think that’s been a little bit sad, and I do wonder if that’s the case. I’m saying this based on my instinct. I haven’t done any actual research, but it does feel like there aren’t a ton of sustainability jobs out there. I wonder if we’re going to start seeing a pulling away based on a combination of both the political factors and also maybe there aren’t a thousand sustainability consultant jobs materializing every year.

[00:22:47] – Maria

If we might start to see, not an abandonment of the issue, but certainly perhaps less enthusiasm for it.

[00:22:54] – John

Overall, are you a bull or a bear for business education in Caroline, Bull or Bear?

[00:23:03] – Caroline

Well, I think it’s a very complex picture, and I’m not sure how things are going to play out this year.

[00:23:09] – John

You’re half Bull, half Bear.

[00:23:11] – Caroline

Right. I think that the international programs are going to do very well in terms of demand. The US schools, I think it’s going to be a more of a mixed picture. I think the top schools will always do well because they have a loyal pipeline that is coming through every year, regardless of where we are in the cycle and regardless of what is happening in the marketplace. So I think the top programs will continue to do well. I think the class composition will shift a bit as we’ve discussed, but I think that it will be tough for some of the mid to lower-tier programs.

[00:23:50] – John

Okay. Bull or bear. Maria?

[00:23:52] – Maria

I feel like if you were to combine a bull and a bear together and then caffinate it, you’d get a Tasmanian devil. That is just spinning around in this hyperkinetic flux. And that’s my prediction for the upcoming year. I’m not sure where it’s going to land. Yeah, I’m not sure where it’s going to land, but it is spinning and there is some chaos and a lot of unpredictable in its path. But yeah, I think there are going to be some bearish situations and outcomes, as Caroline just mentioned. And I think that that means that it’s interesting that business schools themselves. I always get a kick out of when I go to a business school’s website, especially a school that touts its marketing department, and their own website is actually not very good. Now it’s going to be a chance for the business schools themselves to practice what they preach. For years, they’ve been teaching things like change management and how do you manage innovation. Well, now they themselves are going to have to reinvent their own offerings, start walking their own talk and asking themselves, Okay, we’re the ultimate case study. We are now trying to determine what we’re going to do, and seeing how they adapt, whether it is through, I don’t know, microcredentials or shorter courses or hybrid online versus in-person.

[00:25:06] – Maria

But I don’t know where it’s going to all land, but I do think that there’s going to be a lot of ups and downs and a lot of spinning-arounds.

[00:25:14] – John

I think that’s true. I think I’m more a bull than a bear because after all, I tend to be or try to be optimistic. If you have been listening to our podcast over all these, you will know that you are really listening to three very optimistic and hopeful people here. So the mixed view from Caroline and Maria is scary to me because these two people are eternal optimists. I also think that in every challenge, there’s great opportunity. And one thing that a business teaches you in a business school does is that a challenge is a time to actually gain a triumph, not a failure or a defeat. Because there’s so much opportunity in these challenges in these difficult times, and to look at them that way as opposed to, Oh, my, what are we going to do now? Is really one of the secrets of success and resiliency and proving people wrong. You got to love to prove people wrong. I’m a little bit more of a bull than a bear, although I acknowledge it’s going to be some challenges, but I think out of those challenges are going to come some changes that are going to be very positive for the world of business education and for the people who engage and connect with it.

[00:26:37] – John

So there you have it, 2026. Happy New Year to you. If you are applying in round 2, round 3, or a subsequent round, if your target schools have one, good luck to you. If you’re still thinking, Oh, my goodness, should I get ready for round 1 in September of this year and start my thinking now? You should. Don’t be dissuaded by the political wins in America. As rapidly as they have changed, they will change again. And with the onset of the midterms in the US, things could be dramatically different in a much shorter time frame than you can imagine. Also, remember, you apply in September, you don’t matriculate until a year later. You don’t graduate for two years after that. Guess what? The Trump administration is going to be long gone. Because we’re all three eternal optimists here, we don’t predict any continuation of that administration, right? Maria is crossing her fingers.

[00:27:48] – Maria

And my toes. I’ve got both hands, fingers crossed. I’ve got the toes crossed.

[00:27:56] – John

So there you have it, everyone. Hey, have a great new year. We’re rooting for you, no matter where you are in the application process or whether you’re in a leadership position at a business school. Know that this is going to be a fascinating year for you. It will be filled with challenges. And you know what? If you are a leader in this field and you don’t have a challenge, you don’t have a job. Enjoy it. Love it. All right. Happy New Year. This is John Byrne with Poets & Quants. Quads.

What To Expect In 2026
ApplicantLab |
January 5, 2026

Video transcript, for you skimmers out there: 

I love the fact that they. Report on this metric, right? The salary percentage increase, I think is an incredibly valuable metric because there are so many business schools out there that are great for so many people. And at the end of the day, these programs are in fact able to do what a lot of business school applicants are hoping for.

They are in fact able to provide a real change in the trajectory of someone’s career. They are, in fact, able to help people leapfrog. Into a higher career stratum than they would’ve otherwise been able to be in. So from that perspective, I love the fact that the FT reports on the salary percentage increase.

So valuable. I think it helps, when sometimes I talk to people at the beginning of the business school journey, I will frequently hear something like, well, it’s M seven or bust, you know, it’s Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, or bust.

And I’m often like, look, slow your roll, man. There are so many programs out there that are going to get you. They might not be the first ones that you think [00:01:00] of, but wow, does that even matter? I mean, whew. Look at some of these numbers. $170,000. That is nothing to sneeze at, especially if it’s one and a half times more than what you were making before business school.

I mean, wow. , That is life changing. , And these schools can really change people’s lives. And I think it’s important to have this metric available because I think it helps open people’s eyes. To, To be a little bit more open-minded. , And I think that’s wonderful.

Where my little quibble is. Is that I believe this is an important metric to report upon. However, I do not believe that it is a metric that should have significant amount of weight in the rankings because if we think about what is the purpose of a ranking, it is meant to be some sort of a representation of relative quality.

Now rankings. The entire concept of them is flawed the entire, for me, the entire concept of an ordinal ranking is ridiculous. Like school versus two versus four, versus seven versus six . You know, like, there, there’s sort of [00:02:00] these tiny miniature marginal differences. I think that school rankings should instead be in buckets.

Like, here is the top bucket, and then here is the also very good, but just underneath the top bucket, the next bucket. Um, but no one, no one listens to me. Uh, but so anyway, to the extent that a ranking. Is intended to be some sort of a measure of a program’s quality. I don’t think that this metric is one that should be included in the weighting.

Look, again, . Life-changing levels of improvements in salary. But when I look at, okay, so these were the top five programs by the salary percentage increase, but now when I look at it by the weighted salary, right, the top five US programs, by weighted salary, it’s not entirely accurate to say that.

Well, these programs, you start with people who have lower incoming salaries and they end up in the same place as the other programs. The numbers do not [00:03:00] really, , the numbers would tell a slightly different story. So if you look at the weighted salary a few years out for the top five programs by salary,

we’re talking about a $70,000 a year difference, roughly 240 a year versus 170 a year. That’s about a 40% difference, which I don’t think is a small, you know, if we were talking 5%, even 10%, I’d be like, yeah, 10%, that’s nothing. It’s, you know, nothing but 40% I do think is a pretty, I think it’s a pretty significant difference, uh, that is worth noting.

And so. Your point about like, well, they were letting in the people who were already on a, you know, if you were making, let’s see if we can, if we figure out, okay, so if we take this, these numbers, then we can sort of back into what’s an implied pre MBA salary, you know, that would indicate maybe something in the mid sixties before MBA versus, you know, one 10 something, [00:04:00] 1, 1 10, 1 15, for these other programs.

I get your argument. Your argument is like, look, these people were already clearly high achievers prior to business school, and so, mm-hmm. Is it not true then that the business school, like they would’ve continued to be high achievers And in fact, this is true, some of the most successful, financially successful people I know skipped business school altogether and they didn’t need it.

, However, I think GMAC often does, polls or surveys of MBA graduates, and I think the vast majority of them, at a minimum say that they’re glad that they went to business school, that they do feel that it was worth, their time. So. How much of this is,, nature versus nurture.

We, we will never know. , But I would gently push back on the fact that I, because these numbers essentially to the extent that they’re lower than say these numbers, it effectively penalizes thes e schools in this ranking. And for that reason, I don’t think that it should be part of the ranking because you’re penalizing a school for letting in more successful people.

But there’s a benefit. [00:05:00] To attending. Like, first of all, if you are a more successful person, think of the opportunity cost that you’re giving up. So the fact that these schools are able to lure away people to give up two years of their salary, in order to go to business school in the first place, I think is a pretty good indicator of the desirability or the perceived desirability of those programs.

Also, I do think that there is merit to thinking about like, who are my peers going to be in a business school? and. If a school is attracting people who were more successful prior to business school, I actually think that that is an indicator of the quality of the school, not only because it shows the people that are willing to give up those two years of salary, but also think about who the peer group is once someone is in the school.

Right? That means that if you are attending one of these schools. This percentage isn’t as high, but you’re surrounded by people who, prior to business school, were already achieving on a different level. And also after they graduate, they continue to achieve on a different level. True. The slope is not as sharp.

Right. But the.

[00:06:00] Result is a larger number. So I think that this implies that perhaps at the school itself, you might be surrounded by people who are driven. some people might say more competitive, which might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but people who are more driven and also after they graduate, they continue to be driven.

And so I think that also implies something pretty powerful about the ultimate benefit of the network because business school isn’t just the two years you go there and it’s not just that first job you get out of school or that third job you have five years out of school.

it’s also who’s your network gonna be and, and who are you gonna call 10, 15, 20 years after graduation? To invest in your company or to partner with your company or to start a company with. so I do think that there is value to attending a school and to have your peers during school and after school be people who were, for lack of a better term, high performers.

[00:07:00] I don’t think that this should be punished because I do think that this does yield a better business school. Experience and a better result in the long term. And so my quibble, again, I love this metric. I think this is an amazing metric to provide, but my quibble is that this should not be given honestly, any weight at all, and certainly not the high level of weight that it’s given, because again, you’re punishing the schools that, you know, you’re basically indicating that I, what I would say is an indication of quality.

An indirect indication of quality, but an indication of quality all the same. You’re basically punishing the schools that have sort of higher quality, quote unquote, coming in. And, and that to me is. Counterintuitive and kind of wrong. And so that’s why I continue to think that this should not be, uh, reported upon.

Absolutely. Tell us. It’s important. I think it’s great to know. I love using this information, but I don’t think it should be used in terms of like, let’s figure out which programs are the , [00:08:00] quote unquote highest quality programs. But what do you think? What did I miss? let me know. Thanks.

ApplicantLab

New around here? ApplicantLab provides the SAME advice as high-end consultants at a much more affordable price. Read our rave reviews on GMATClub, and check out our free trial (no credit card required) today!